WIN AT ROULETTE!

Correlation between the risk of a bet and the amount of possible winnings

It is known that the bigger the possible winnings the higher the risk of losing a bet. The reverse statement is also right - the less the risk of loss, the less the possible winnings.

How is it possible to multiply possible winnings?
1. To increase the amount of a bet. But the possibility of a loss is also increasing.
2. To do a bet on the other chance. For example, instead of doing a bet on a simple chance do a bet on a dozen. But the risk of loss is increasing too.

How is it possible to decrease the risk of a loss (the amount of the possible winning decreases)?
1. To decrease the amount of a bet - the amount of a possible loss decreases.
2. To do a bet on the other chance. For example, instead of doing a bet on a simple chance, do a bet on two dozens.
3. To divide a bet into a few successive bets of less amount.

We will consider the last on an example:
There are 10 chips. At a bet of 10 chips on a simple chance, winning probability of 10 chips is 0,49%, loss probability of 10 chips - 0,51%. At 10 bets with 1 chip each on a simple chance winning probability of 10 chips is 0,00074%, loss of 10 chips - 0,001275025%.
In the second case probability to lose 10 chips decreases in 402 times but also probability to win 10 chips decreases in 655 times.
.
We speak about probability here. Probability enables to give some quantative estimation of risk but it is not a law which is always necessarily executed. In the real game it is possible to lose and win 10 bets in succession. Learn to accept these probabilities in a right way. For example, according to statistics 23 or 24 numbers drop out on the average for 37 spins, and 10 of them drop out twice, and 2 or 3 numbers - three times (the law of two thirds). At first it seems that on the average there should drop out all 37 numbers of 37.

Very often at the game of roulette the preference is given to the bets on simple chances. There are serious reasons to suppose that this is not the optimal choice.

A casino wants the game to run as long as possible because a casino takes an advantage in the final. It is logical to assume that player has an opposite purpose - to make the game as short as possible and win the maximal amount of money for the minimum amount of spins.

Let's compare two simplest betting systems:
The First system: five successive bets on simple chances with 1 chip each. Maximal winning -5 chips, maximal loss - 5 chips.
The Second system: five successive bets on one number with 1 chip each. Maximal winning -175 chips, maximal loss - 5 chips. Even if one bet wins the winning will be 31 chips.
You can do the simplest calculations of correlation between chances and amount of the possible winning.

Of course the risk to lose 5 chips in the first system is considerably less. But at the use of the first system there is no possibility of getting an appreciable winning quickly.

We are constantly saying that roulette is a game of chance. If a fortune has smiled to you though for a moment - you should use this chance.
Let's go back to the simple chances.
Supposing we did a bet with 1 chip on black and lost it. Is it possible to return a loss and in addition to get a winning by the next bet? Certainly - it is possible to increase the amount of a bet or to do a bet on the other chance or to do both at the same time. In the simplest case we increase the amount of a bet up to 2 chips, and do this bet again on black. We lost again. Now the general loss is 3 chips. For compensation of the accumulated loss and receiving a minimum winning, we do the following bet: 4 chips on black. Again we lost - the general loss is 7 chips and the next bet is 8 chips. And so on.

Thus, at a winning even of one bet we cover all the previous losses and remain in a plus. Some day we'll be lucky and then we will win.